Main

January 10, 2012

what jon huntsman was talking about (u.s. blues '12)

Jon Huntsman recently prescribed a "Grateful Dead tour of this country" as a cure-all for our national ills led by a candidate "who rallies the support of the American people in getting term limits and closing the revolving doors of lobbyists." In this case, I think, "Dead tour" slipped out Huntsman's mouth as shorthand for a populist/collectivist groundswell with its own obsessive following, something richer and more real than mere grassroots support. And if that's what Huntsman meant, some freegan should flyer him with #ows propaganda ASAP, it being an heir to the anarchistic/countercultural momentum the Dead carried for some LSD-soaked stretch of the time-track. Either that or show Huntsman Bob Roberts, which is probably more what a Republican candidate-based Dead tour would look like.

Either way, the more interesting part to me is the deployment of the Dead as a symbol by a Republican presidential candidate who--despite claiming to be a Captain Beefheart fan--pretty much has to the definition of square. This goes beyond Al and Tipper Gore inviting the band to the White House. They were fans of the band who at least came out of the same cultural moment. For a Mormon son of a billionaire, this is an invocation of a wholly different kind. "Grateful Dead" once meant something in ye olde English folklore about paying the funeral bills of an anonymous stranger who died in debt. Now, it has a folkloric resonance now of an entirely different sort, a meaning in the American mother-tongue beyond the band itself. Jon Huntsman won't be getting my vote in any reality, but he certainly has my ear. I wish him the best as he is devoured the traditional manner of the grimacing white man's quadrennial blood orgy.

December 14, 2011

"run rudolph run," 12/14/71, hill auditorium, ann arbor, MI

Download here. [MP3]

The Dead played "Run Rudolph Run" seven times between December 4th and 15th, 1971. Pigpen sang. The tune was a #69 hit for Chuck Berry in 1958, written by Johnny Marks and Marvin Brodie. Unquestionably the best Dead version is the second-to-last, from December 14th at the Hill Auditorium in Ann Arbor. They played it twice in Chuck Berry's hometown of St. Louis on December 9th and 10th, and it's too bad not one of those, but the first night in Ann Arbor has the best mix of any of them. Keith Godchaux's strident Johnnie Johnson-style piano is full and rich, like the familiar warm balance of Europe '72, Garcia's lines darting around it. Besides the following night, where he's too loud, Godchaux is buried in most of the other recordings, Garcia and Weir's guitars clanging against each other.

It's a showcase for Pigpen, returning to the band after sitting out the fall tour, the first sign of weakening for the 26-year old alcoholic, who would die less than two years later. At times on the December east coast run, 11 shows from Boston to Ann Arbor, Pig is spotty. In Boston, the band pulled out his show-stopping "Turn On Your Lovelight," and he faltered, unable to martial the gang into the weirdly psych-funk nooks they were often able to improvise behind semi-improvised patter about "box back knitties and great big noble thighs," and they only revisited it one other time on the trip.

But by the end of the run, he seems almost back to form, though the big closers wouldn't return with regularity until the band shuffled off to New York and then Europe the next spring. One lesson of my Dead listening project--revisiting every show close to its 40th anniversary, #deadfreaksunite, etc.--has been a constant reevaluation of the Dead as a working, aggressively evolving band, often marked by the unrelenting, constant expansion of their songbook. Most lately, this involved an appreciation of Pigpen's still very active role in '71 and '72. Even for Deadheads, Pig is sometimes easy to write off in these later years, so often relegated to un-mic'ed sidestage congas.

While he didn't exactly crank out tunes like Garcia and Weir, he had two new numbers to do for the December run, "Run Rudolph Run" and a new original, "Mr. Charlie," which would go along fine with "Empty Pages," introduced earlier in the year, had he not already abandoned that. Early '72 would see two more Pig tunes go into rotation, "Chinatown Shuffle" (whose pick-up would get jacked for "U.S. Blues") and the lost masterpiece "The Stranger (Two Souls in Communion)." Even after he left the road following the Europe '72 tour, he continued to write, producing a set of home demos, which has circulated as Bring Me My Shotgun.

With its "Love & Theft"-like cadences on half-sensical tumbles about some heretofore unknown reindeer named Randolph (?!) and archaic constructions like "girl-child" and "boy-child," it's sort of mystifying that avowed Chuck Berry freak Bob Dylan didn't record "Run Rudolph Run" for his Christmas in the Heart. But it's a nice little novelty from the Dead's brief two-keyboard lineup, where Pigpen and Godchaux got a nice Hudson/Manuel-like B3/piano blend on some of the recordings from those tours. Though Pig doesn't play organ here, Godchaux's presence gives him the chance to belt over straight-up boogie-woogie piano, a rare pleasure in itself only possible during these few tours.

All of which totally ignores the song's holidayness, which really has no narrative and is, in an admirably teen-pop way, more about describing the apparent giddiness of the Christmas season in the post-War years. "Shopping is a feeling," David Byrne said later in True Stories, and there's maybe some of that in here (infused with holiday spirit, no doubt), with the subtle '50s consumerism behind lyrics like "all I want for Christmas is a rock & roll electric guitar" and the girl-child's wish for "a little baby doll that can cry, scream, and wet" (plus perfectly period automotive dreams about Santa speeding down a freeway). Not that Pigpen was signifyin' or anything. He was--and thanks to the perpetual present tense of the recording is--just singing. The Dead may've been hippies, but by late 1971, they were mostly just a rock band.

"Run Rudolph Run"--at least the fifth or sixth Berry tune in rotation--is Pig in his element, and a vibrant little tick in Dead history. But it's something maybe even more unique than that. In the Dead's massive unofficial catalogue, it's one of the very few versions of anything I'd happily call "definitive" with any measure of confidence. And, hey, that's something to feel good about this holiday season.

January 7, 2009

hippie punx on the loose in bourgwick, 1/09

The hippie punx continue to roam Bourgwick. Maybe more MC5/fucking-in-the-streets style than (re)united Dead Freaks, they've nonetheless colonized a shredded subway ad at my stop with their manifesto-like graffiti.

April 8, 2008

"mountains of the moon" (original angel choir mix) - the grateful dead

"Mountains of the Moon" - The Grateful Dead (download)
from Aoxomoxoa original mix (1969)

High on the list of Dead tunes likely to convert freak-folkers is Aoxomoxoa's "Mountains of the Moon." With Tom Constanten's swirling harpsichord and Robert Hunter's oblique, mythical lyrics, it's a bauble that didn't sustain in the Dead's repertoire, whose most tender songs required (for better or worse) a certain machismo to survive the 'heads. While "Mountains" served as a perfect prelude to at least 11 "Dark Stars" in 1969, its modal (1) melody couldn't even last long enough for the band's abundant acoustic sets the following year. Drag.

I love how Hunter's lyrics get down with the folk mythos -- Tom Banjo, Electra, etc. -- but also find a moment of psychedelic focus, the hallucinations parting for a brief second like ascending angels: "hey, the city in the rain."

It is perhaps the aforementioned angels who hummm and ooooh behind the original 1969 version on Aoxomoxoa, removed by Jerry Garcia himself in a 1971 remix. On first listen, I wished there were more of them, but I think they're in just the right proportion to last the duration of the track's four minutes without grating. Like the Blood on the Tracks demo acetate, the Aoxomoxoa mix comes bundled with the vinyl warmth of its source. (Big ups to SeaOfSound for the music.)

(1) I think.

February 21, 2008

"eighth of january" - the kentucky colonels with scotty stoneman

"Eighth of January" - The Kentucky Colonels with Scott Stoneman (download) (buy)

(file expires February 27th)

Thanks to Rev for turning me onto this recording of Scott Stoneman and the Kentucky Colonels performing "Eighth of January" at the Ash Grove in Los Angeles in 1965. In the audience that night was Jerry Garcia.

I get my improvisational approach from Scotty Stoneman, the fiddle player. [He's] the guy who first set me on fire -- where I just stood there and I don't remember breathing. He was just an incredible fiddler. He was a total alcoholic wreck by the time I heard him, in his early thirties, playing with the Kentucky Colonels... They did a medium-tempo fiddle tune like 'Eighth of January' and it's going along, and pretty soon Scotty starts taking these longer and longer phrases -- ten bars, fourteen bars, seventeen bars -- and the guys in the band are just watching him! They're barely playing -- going ding, ding, ding -- while he's burning. The place was transfixed. They played this tune for like twenty minutes, which is unheard of in bluegrass. I'd never heard anything like it. I asked him later, 'How do you do that?' and he said, 'Man, I just play lonesome.' (Garcia, c. 1985, via Blair Jackson's Garcia: An American Life)

By the time the music made it to tape -- which is to say, in reality -- it was five and a third minutes, proving Garcia's memory to be about as blown as any Deadhead's. He's not wrong either, though. (See also "Cleo's Back" for the further secret history of the Grateful Dead.)

January 4, 2008

dead freaks unite, no. 2

"Box of Rain" - The Grateful Dead (download) (buy)
from American Beauty (1970)

The Lorimer/Metropolitan station connects the L train to the G train, or Williamsburg to Park Slope. It is, needless to say, a Brooklynite hub. After discovering Grateful Dead graffiti there last year, I had another late night Dead encounter, this time with a drunk hipster.

At around 2 in the morning, over Thanksgiving weekend, he wandered onto the Brooklyn-bound side, carrying a mostly empty bottle of wine, and singing at the top of his lungs. His bellows slapped off the tile, making the lyrics that much more indistinguishable as he sang along with his iPod. I slipped off my headphones, curious to hear what he was singing: "Box of Rain." Needless to say, I started singing along.

Dude had owned American Beauty in high school but was recently inspired to dust it off thanks to the concluding episode of Paul Feig and Judd Apatow's Freaks and Geeks, in which Lindsay Weir discovers the Dead and skips out on a summertime academic summit to head off on Dead tour.

The reclamation continues.

May 30, 2007

the fader's garcia issue & "mountains of the moon" - grateful dead

"Mountains of the Moon" - the Grateful Dead (download) (buy)
recorded 1 March 1969, Fillmore West, San Francisco

(file expires June 6th)

As I've been saying all along, the Dead are hip and getting hipper. With the publication of The Fader's Jerry Garcia issue (download it fer free!), the circle is complete. It's official: Jerry's cool again. And it's about fucking time.

It is interesting to see Garcia liberated from the thin, crammed pages of Relix and splashed gorgeously across the thick glossy sheets and high modern layouts of The Fader. The editors present a very specific version of Garcia that is far from the genial, bearded fat dude he was for his last 15 years, and who is often still celebrated by the jamband scene. Titled "Jerry Garcia: American Beauty," only two of the nine photos of Garcia (including full-sized front & back cover shots) feature the iconic beard. Instead, we get the doe-eyed beatific boy from San Francisco.

Arranged as an oral history/appreciation, the spread features quotes from the usual suspects (Bob Weir, Mountain Girl, David Grisman), but also pontificatin' from various hipster musicians, including Devendra Banhart, Isaac Brock of Modest Mouse, Craig Finn of the Hold Steady, duder from Animal Collective, and others. Though they missed a few good quotables (no Lee Ranaldo?), they all present alternative readings on how to listen to the Dead. Alternative to the Deadhead mainstream, that is.

What happens now that the Dead are seemingly back in the dialogue, I have no idea.

March 19, 2007

get ahead, 3/07

"Mississippi Half-Step" - the Grateful Dead (download here)
recorded 20 October 1974
Winterland Arena - San Francisco, CA
from The Grateful Dead Movie Soundtrack (2005)
released by Grateful Dead Records (buy)

Even in deepest Williamsburg, Deadheads survive, here leaving their mark on the Brooklyn-bound platform of the Lorimer Street L-train station. Definitely a WTF?, but I'm glad the Deadheads are taking back the streetz. Or, as Boomy reminds: Dead Freaks Unite!

January 26, 2007

"okie from muskogee" - the grateful dead with the beach boys

"Okie From Muskogee" - the Grateful Dead with the Beach Boys (download here)
recorded 27 April 1971
Fillmore East, NYC

(file expires February 2nd)

"We've got another famous California group here," Jerry Garcia announced without much drama midway through the middle night of the Grateful Dead's five-night run to close out the Fillmore East in April 1971. "It's the Beach Boys."

And out they came, or the post Brian Wilson incarnation anyway, to join the Dead for five songs, and to play two of their own in the middle. Like many sloppy superjams before and many since, it didn't quite add up, but remains rather amusing. There are some great moments, from Carl Wilson's fucking baked-ass "hello" as he arrives onstage to the Deadheads' cries of "bring back the Dead" between Deadless renditions of "Good Vibrations" and "I Get Around" (the former introduced by Bruce Johnston as "a song that reflects these really fucked-up times") (wha?).

The most musical artifact of the set, though, is a rendition of Merle Haggard's still-newish redneck classic "Okie From Muskogee" which finally gets down to business: hearing Garcia's guitar dart between the Boys' harmonies. The Dead had been grooving on Haggard all month (indeed, a lovely Garcia reading of "Sing Me Back Home" would be the encore that night), and the ease with which they play matches the laid back Californicana of the BBs' severely underrated albums from that period. There, ever so briefly, the great straights from the south and the great freaks from the north clicked, and over what? Some tongue-in-cheek twang. Go figure.

January 17, 2007

america on-line (greatest misses #5) & "brokedown palace" - the grateful dead

"Brokedown Palace" - the Grateful Dead (download here)
recorded 11 April 1972
Newcastle City Hall, Newcastle, UK
from Steppin' Out with the Grateful Dead (2002)
released by Grateful Dead Records (buy)

(file expires January 24th)

It's hard to find an excuse to publish a two-and-a-half year-old review of a show by a band I don't like very much. But I'm going to, anyway, because it involved a pleasantly bizarre excursion to Central Park, and this thing has stewed on my harddrive for way too long. At one point, it was supposed to have run in the Interboro Rock Tribune, though -- if it did -- I sure never saw a copy.

And "Brokedown Palace"? Well, why not? Consider it a spoonful of honey for all the theorizing about Dave Matthews. Or maybe it's just honey because honey is fucking delicious. Anyway, I came across this version tonight, recorded in Newcastle on April 11th, 1972, and I love it. For some reason, I can't remember ever hearing a version from '72 (or '73 or '74, my fave Dead period), though DeadBase swears there are plenty. Except for the high harmonies near the end, it's all so perfectly assured, maybe even more than the American Beauty rendition, especially Garcia's monstrously concise solo.

***
America On Line
by Jesse Jarnow

When guitarist Warren Haynes took the stage with the Dave Matthews Band during their massive free concert at Central Park on September 24th, few cheered. That was to be expected. Though Haynes is revered in some quarters as the ever-active guitarist for the Allman Brothers Band, Gov't Mule, and Grateful Dead bassist Phil Lesh's eponymous quintet, he's mostly unknown in the mainstream.

After dueting with Matthews on a rendition of Neil Young's "Cortez The Killer," Haynes ripped into a soaring solo. It was typical Big Rock fare, Haynes's fingers flying impassioned up the fretboard in a show of bluesy virtuosity, face scrunched in anguish and splayed across the nine jumbo screens to underscore the point. The solo blew to a volcanic climax, the tension released from Haynes's body, and he stepped back.

And, again, few cheered.

This raises some questions. Likely, it wasn't a show of displeasure. Nobody was booing, nor were people offering up any particular show of criticism. And it wasn't abject boredom. Around me, on the fringe of the crowd, people seemed to be having a grand evening under the stars, laughing and smiling in all directions. So, what was it? Why hadn't that old reliable, the Big Solo, ignited them?

On the surface, the Dave Matthews Band appear to have inherited the stadium rock mantle once held by bands like Led Zeppelin and, more recently, U2: an old-fashioned rock outfit (give or take) capable of creating best-selling records and filling impossibly large halls wherever they choose to roam. But, as the crowd's reaction to Haynes indicated, perhaps not all is what it seems.

Beneath the same ol', same ol' exterior of the rock concert as suburban coming of age ritual, the practices of young concertgoers have subtly mutated. To say that they are having shallower experiences at the shows they attend because, say, their experiences are apparently non-musical is to miss the point. They're still having a good time and they're still, like it or not, coming of age. So, what is it that they latch onto?

***
Given the truly epic surreality of the event, from its conception to is execution - light years removed from the uncomplicated cause-and-effect of liking a band, hearing about their show, buying a ticket, and going (and even further from the vaunted free concerts of yore) - it's right boggling to conceive of the AOL Concert For Schools as a teenager's first rock show. Rock concerts have always been theaters of the absurd, but the dramatis personae seem to be changing of late. In Manhattan, anyway, ads had plastered subways and buses for several weeks. Typical copy depicted a picture of a row of school desks, the AOL running man logo branded onto the corner of each (a frightening thought), and the caption "Life needs a music lesson."

Waiting on line, the acquisition of tickets seemed to be the most popular topic of discussion. Officially, they had been distributed for free via white AOL vans that parked at various Manhattan street corners throughout the week. But, being free and pretty much indiscriminately passed out - in a relatively mysterious way, at that, some seemingly arbitrarily, some after participating in contests - they quickly fell into other hands. We heard tales of a temporary black market that had sprung up to accommodate the distribution of tickets, funneling them out to the suburbs via EBay and co-workers and friends of friends with favors to call, sometimes free, but mostly not.

The line coiled through the park, a human Great Wall of China drudging in slow motion through Frederick Law Olmstead's Arcadian landscaping, disappearing into the greenery at one end, stretching out onto Central Park's bordering avenues on the other. On the east side, we had followed it south from the park's entrance at 72nd Street with no end in sight, as Jon looked for somebody to bestow his spare ticket on.

A kid overheard us. "Do you have an extra?" he asked, with a slight accent.

"Maybe," Jon replied

"Ya, I came from Germany," he said.

"Oh yeah?" I replied, glancing at his Ithaca College hoodie.

"Ya," he confirmed. "I'm from Munich."

"Okay, you got it," Jon said.

"Oh, danke!" Munich Boy grinned, and scurried off, ducking under a barricade and cutting into the line.

"Do you ever get the impression that the way these kids act on line might be a good metaphor for the way they'll turn out later in life?" I asked Jon.

He paused. "Nah, that's stupid."

We pressed onward. Near 70th Street, past a row of port-o-lets, the line suddenly changed directions, as if we had passed the equator.

"The line doubles back somewhere down there," a girl groused.

"This sucks, I wanna go home," a nearby cop grumbled. "I could be in class right now."

"Down there" was 65th Street, just north of the Central Park Zoo. "Screw this," Jon announced, and turned into the park, following the sidewalk along the thru-road. A hundred yards into the park, we hopped the small stone wall, climbed a grassy embankment, and looked down on the line, which we could see in the distance. We could see dozens of other dissidents, looking for alternate paths into the concert. I wondered how many of them were first-time concertgoers.

We cursed Munich Boy as we clamored through the underbrush after the hillside we were following suddenly dropped away. We roamed the Ramble, occasionally catching sight of the line. It was a lovely evening for a stroll, and we wandered up paths and down stairs and past the pond and the gondolas and rowboats peacefully adrift. At the Boathouse, men in white linen suits dined, seemingly unaware of the horde of teenagers milling on the other side of the treeline.

We slipped into line. "Hey, good idea, man!" a guy said, unbothered by the fact that we were blatantly cutting in.

"How long have you been here?" I asked a girl next to us.

"Five hours," she replied.

"Man, I got here three hours ago," said a kid standing next to her.

"Really?" said somebody else. "We walked up, like 45 minutes ago. Didn't even cut."

The line had broken down their sense of time, it seemed. Mine, too. I have no recollection of how long we were there. People talked. Besides how they got their tickets, they rarely spoke about the band they were there to see (unheard of at show by Phish or the Grateful Dead, two bands the DMB is frequently lumped with). They didn't even speak with particular frequency about other bands, but mostly about movies or television shows.

While this might not seem worth remarking on at first, it seems some indication of the way the Dave Matthews Band (and, thus, the rock concert as an entity) might now be viewed by young fans: music as something undifferentiated from other pop culture mediums, as opposed to an autonomous experience that exists outside of the mainstream of American life. In other words: rock not as rebellion at all, but as a completely sanctioned experience. Though this has probably been the norm for some time, the concert form has seemingly transformed around this ideal.

We passed a row of ticket takers, a pile of confiscated lawn chairs and blankets (for a day in the park, at that), a thoroughly crouch-mauling patdown (hands placed and suddenly jerked UP), and a bag search (though, officially, they weren't allowing bags in at all; terror, etc.). Though our tickets had been ripped, and word had come that the show had started, we still couldn't hear any music. Abruptly, two girls in front of us shrieked, charged up a small hill in the vague direction of the concert field, and disappeared into the woods. There was a rustling, then silence.

***
The lush green of the Great Lawn sprawled before us, the stately regency of Belvedere Castle and the midtown skyline at our back. The music ricocheted between speaker towers in an echoed maze, bearing strange sonic resemblance to an avant-garde multi-channel sound installation. Six giant screens stood in V-formation, pointing towards the distant stage, which was adorned by its own screen. Though the field was half-empty (presumably, most were still on line), clumps of people gathered around each of the screens.

Each was mounted on an elaborate scaffolding which also included several banks of lights, and a smoke machine. The former flashed constantly, moreless indiscriminately (which didn't matter, since the images were hardly synched with the music coming from the speakers). The latter, positioned below the screen, jetted smoke straight upward, thanks to industrial fans just beneath the chute. The lights and the smoke both came between one's sightline and the broadcast images, which simultaneously drew the eye in and created the impression that one was, indeed, watching something real at the center. Crowds sat cross-legged at the bases of the scaffolding, goggling upwards.

A camera mounted on a crane swept over the crowd. Another camera stood on a smaller scaffolding that rose from the midst of the throng. With the exception of a few songs in the middle of the band's set, the operator trained the camera away from the stage for the entire night, presumably for the DVD of the concert, already set to be released on November 4th. There was no shortage of striking images. A girl holding a bouquet of heart-shaped balloons of silver mylar wandered by, the balloons momentarily framed by smoke billowing from the screen.

Instead of the usual between song pandemonium, the air vacuumed to near silence after a brief smattering of applause. Despite this, the music was not an unimportant part of the event. There was dancing, though it was frequently directed at each other in clusters, like a school dance, as opposed to at the stage. There were singalongs, though only at preset moments, as opposed to when the mood struck. There were giddy screams when favorite songs were played, though they were usually followed by cell phone calls, as opposed to intent listening.

So, why is the Dave Matthews Band the premier party band of the early 21st century? Surely, part of their appeal is in their Joe Rockband quality. Matthews is, as Rolling Stone's David Fricke called him, "the ultimate Everyman." Their music maps to that description, too. Despite several long instrumental excursions, there was little extreme about the band's performance. They played at comfortable tempos with no distortion. All of this accounts for the band's accessibility, for the college following that was Matthews' bread and butter in earlier years, but doesn't explain why listeners seem to be applying different standards to Matthews' music than previous generations.

Or does it?

Despite its size, despite the screens, the show in Central Park was as close to a non-spectacle as one could get at that magnitude. When soloing, bandmembers would make a point of stepping close to each other and making eye contact. Again, it was an old rock trick (e.g. Robert Plant drawing the crowd's attention to Jimmy Page by moving near and watching him solo), but effective. But, when Plant looked at Page, he frequently did so with awe, putting the guitarist on a pedestal for the audience by temporarily playing low status.

By contrast, the Dave Matthews Band's gestures were far more humble. By design or happenstance, each revealed the band as six men playing music in real time. In an age where jump cuts are the norm and linear performances are practically unknown in popular culture, that can be powerful good. It is well possible that the Dave Matthews Band appeals for the same reason that country music suddenly found itself in vogue in the late '60s. There is not so much an authenticity to the Dave Matthews Band as there is an undiluted simplicity -- which is a helluva thing to say about a rock and roll band playing music in front of an estimated 100,000 people at a concert sponsored by one of the biggest corporations in the world.

In this case, it's not what the guitars are doing, but that there are even guitars at all. Through all, Matthews inspires a certain comfort level. And, hey, as an audience member, that feels great. It is precisely because the rock concert has become such an ingrained ritual that the Dave Matthews Band thrives: simply, at a Dave Matthews Band show, one doesn't have to behave like he's at a rock concert.

There are no pretensions of revelation, no high art or inflatable pigs, not even any obvious attempts to get the crowd riled up. Nobody was beat over the head being told that they were having the time of his or her life. Is that rebellion? Maybe so, maybe not. It's definitely a "to each his own trip" philosophy, minus the drugs and writ large. Like every Everyman, Dave Matthews is a blank slate. Life needs blank slates.

Around us, boys approached girls awkwardly, smoking the second or third cigarettes of their lives, as the new template for a rock show burned itself into their heads. They had meaningful experiences.

"This is the place to be!" a guy in a turquoise Alligator shirt bellowed as he stumbled by. "These guys are the bomb, right?"

A moment later, he held his head and staggered towards the scaffolding, where he vomited. He removed his shirt, revealing a lacrosse uniform, wiped his mouth, and lurched back into the crowd.

January 12, 2007

wetlands/borat karma & "you enjoy myself" - phish

"You Enjoy Myself" - Phish (download here)
recorded 26 October 1989
Wetlands Preserve, NYC (soundboard)

Man, y'know, I hate to be negative & shit, but sometimes life requires it and this story is too good to pass up. Carole De Saram is the President of the Tribeca Community Association. As I found out when I saw the final cut of Wetlands Preserved, a documentary I worked on a few years ago, she was one of the prime movers in forcing the Wetlands Preserve out of Tribeca in September 2001. Call it gentrification or something else, but she displaced a very real community in the name of making her own newer, richer community a little blander. That it happened during a month when communities in Manhattan were needed more than ever only made it shittier.

But then there's karma. Or, more accurately, there's Borat.

Carole De Saram, as it turns out, is also a member of the Veteran Feminists of America, a group Sacha Baron Cohen interviews in Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan. When I saw the film, it was one of the few times where I groaned and thought, "gee, does he really have to fuck with these people?" And the answer, as the universe has pointed out to me, is: hell yes. My new theory is that anybody in Borat who appears innocent is actually atoning for some bad juju he or she previously unleashed on the world.

Anyway, there's something positive to go along with it: a nicely mixed soundboard of Phish playing "You Enjoy Myself" at the Wetlands in October 1989. For non-Phishies open-eared enough to try, this is as good a place to start as any. If you don't enjoy "You Enjoy Myself," you probably won't enjoy Phish. They're not the story here, anyway, Wetlands is: a club that allowed this bizarre music to happen in New York.

Here's a 12-story feature I edited, and partially wrote, about Wetlands on the occasion of its closing.

June 5, 2006

vince welnick

The suicide of former Grateful Dead keyboardist Vince Welnick on Friday saddened me in a way I couldn't have predicted. As a latter-day Deadhead, I never had much use for him. In large part, that is because his tenure fell during Jerry Garcia's final half-decade, a period of terminal musical decline. In the proverbial history book, Welnick is a footnote.

But he was also a real dude, who -- until last week -- was busting his ass trying to make a living playing keyboards (most recently with various Dead cover bands). His story, as posted by his friend Mike Lawson, is heartbreaking. Welnick was depressed, Lawson writes, because his ex-bandmates never invited to any of the periodic Dead regroupings. This, in part, seems to have happened because -- while on tour with Bob Weir and Ratdog -- Welnick overdosed in the back of the bus, and was subsequently shoved unceremoniously into a cab and sent to the emergency room as a John Doe.

There's more, of course, throughout both Lawson's post and the subsequent thread. In a way, with its neat and logical narrative, it makes perfect sense of what happened -- something extraordinarily rare. But just because the story makes sense and has an ending doesn't mean that anything is resolved, or better. Sometimes, the music just doesn't work, and that might be the scariest ending of all.

February 17, 2006

looky looky, wookie! phish outtakes!

"Birthday Boys," "Bubble Wrap," and "Running Scared" - Phish
(zipped file of the three songs)
outtakes from Round Room (2002)

(file expires on February 24th)

How bad could the outtakes be from a Phish album that was basically comprised of demos to begin with? The answer, if you have any wookie blood in you at all, is relative. (And, if you don't, you'll come away hating Phish even more than you already do.)

Yes, yes, relative. That is: the three "new" songs circulating from Phish's 2002 Round Room sessions are very much like their officially released brethren in that they're half-conceived and far less than they should be. Being outtakes, this less-than-whole-assedness is also perfectly excusable. That doesn't make them good (or of interest to anybody not already curious about Phish's creative process).

"Birthday Boys" had already been recorded by Oysterhead, one of the bands Trey Anastasio played with during the two years previous to this session, while Phish was figuring out if they wanted to be a band or not (they didn't, as they determined later). It's nifty, heavy on the same impressionistic twang that defined "Pebbles and Marbles," which led off Round Room. Playful and intricate, it would've made an ace Phish tune -- especially the cleverly modulating ending. The version here borders on trainwreck, especially as it goes, but -- hey -- it's a rehearsal. It coulda been a contenda.

The all-improv (and largely abstract) "Bubble Wrap" is -- I assume -- one of the band's first jams after getting back together. They feel disconnected, their parts moving against each other and trying, mostly unsuccessfully, to lock in. It's kind of uncomfortable to hear Phish, who were rarely less than psychic communicators with big ears, playing like this. A historical curiosity, perhaps. The last song, "Running Scared," most likely isn't Phish at all, but Anastasio demoing with songwriting/drinking chum Tom Marshall. Finding the song in the midst of the sloppiness is like trying to find the marble in the proverbial oatmeal (or maybe just figuring out a magic eye). Either way, it's hard to imagine a way that Phish could've made it all too interesting. So it went.

September 3, 2003

phish dialogue, cont.

I made the decision today to include other stuff in the blog that don't really fit anywhere else. My and I have been talking recently about Phish and politics. A few weeks ago, he made a post to his blog, in response to an email I sent him (which is included in his post). Below is my response. I always feel like a bit of a dolt writing about politics, so hopefully he'll be able to hammer me into shape (bloody politics major).

***
I'm gonna start somewhat away from Phish, with a passage I read this morning in (huh-huh) that Susan Orlean essay in the Best Music Writing book. It's called "The Congo Sound" and is about music from Congo/Zaire.

"Mobutu Sese Seko, the dictator who ruled the country for 32 years, was aware of how directly music communicated to the Congolese. When he took power, in 1965, he demanded that the country's musicians write songs to celebrate his achievement, and then arranged for them to receive generous state sponsorship as a sort of insurance policy against future songs that might question his actions. When he introduced his Authenticité campaign, in 1971, with the aim of ridding the country of foreign influence, he designated the great soukous orchestra O.K. Jazz the official musical medium for conveying his doctrine. He traveled throughout Zaire with the orchestra; after each of his speeches, O.K. Jazz performed, both to sweeten the medicine of Authenticité and to use its lyrics to lecture the crowds, however gorgeously, about Mobutu's programs. It would be like George W. Bush giving a series of speeches about why he wanted to go to war with Iraq, accompanied by foreign-policy songs by Bruce Springsteen."

(Which, of course, is in itself an amusing idea.)

So, this is obviously an extreme example of what happens when music gets politicized. Of course, it doesn't have to happen like this. Orlean points this out. In fact, the bulk of her article is about how so many Congolese musicians ended up in Paris. They were expatriates there, self-exiled because a particular leader would jail them for speaking/singing out against him. Amusingly (sort of), said leader actually was a big music fan, and repeatedly pardoned the worst offenders so they could play concerts. Hopefully, that wouldn't happen in the United States, but it's worth considering.

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that Howard Dean manages to convince Phish to join him on his campaign. They could play before his rallies, and tens of thousands of Phish fans would flock to him. Hell, I'd go. I like Phish. And let's also say, for the sake of argument, that Dean won the election. Finally, let's imagine that, somehow, a buncha electoral wonks derived some formula that proved, without a trace of a doubt, that it was Phishheads who put Dean over the top. All of that would put Phish in a mighty weird spot. Howard Dean is President. He knows Phish can help sell his policies. Then what? Does music then become a part of the government process, ala Zaire? Does Dean go mad with power? Okay, yeah, so that's a paranoid fantasy played out to the extreme. But it leads us to another question, which perhaps we can use to reverse-engineer some interesting stuff: what is the ideal relationship between government/politics and music?

Now, there's surely a difference between government and politics, which you can probably better define. Here's the one I'm going to work with: government is decision-making body, politics is the mechanism that allows the decisions to be acted out.

What is the most ideal? A band that (only) allows themselves to be used to attract potential followers to a politician? Or a band that does this, and then uses their music to amplify the politician's policies? The latter is mighty close to advertising. But, again, it doesn't have to be. Newspapers who report on political decisions certainly don't implicitly endorse what they're covering. There's no reason why a band couldn't, y'know, intelligently critique policy decisions through their music. But what politician wants a band following him around like that? We're then left with the model of the band as independent arbiter, functioning autonomously (again, like a newspaper). They, too, would make policy decisions. Just as the New York Times can make a show of their endorsements, so could Phish. At the beginning of each campaign season and/or Phish tour, they could write songs summarizing the issues, pointing out where everybody stands (a verse for Dean, a verse for Kerry, etc.), and present their conclusions at the end
of a climactic 40 minute jam. Dude, it'd be phat.

But who wants to do that? That's hideously close to didactic Schoolhouse Rock - educational music and stuff - and not particularly what Phish are trying to achieve artistically. So, let's keep on looking for ideals. We're getting closer to the reality of the situation now. The most workable midway point would simply for Phish's lyrics to become more socially conscious without
delving into the specifics. But, without an outright politicization, the impact on politics would be mostly unquantifiable. Nonetheless, I think that would be the ideal: socially conscious (though perhaps still abstract) lyrics, coupled with a political endorsement (or an active attempt to make
people go out and vote). One of the things that I value about Bob Dylan's mid-'60s work (especially John Wesley Harding) is its ability to be completely socially conscious without losing an iota of emotional impact. "All Along The Watchtower" has been covered badly so many times by now that its meaning is mostly gone, but the lyrics are powerful:

"There must be some way out of here," said the joker to the thief,
"There's too much confusion, I can't get no relief
Businessmen, they drink my wine, plowmen dig my earth,
None of them along the line know what any of it is worth."

"No reason to get excited," the thief, he kindly spoke,
"There are many here among us who feel that life is but a joke.
But you and I, we've been through that, and this is not our fate,
So let us not talk falsely now, the hour is getting late."

I can't say exactly how that's socially conscious, but simply through its use of language and character (businessman, joker, thief), the world it puts my imagination in is a real one. Phish, by contrast, puts my imagination in a very fantastical place. Their lyrics have always been vague -- or, at least, obscure. Again, this is an artistic choice, for the most part. And I'd even argue that it's a valid one. Or, at least, it'd be disingenuous if they suddenly became politicized now, 20 years into their career.

They have always been somewhat progressive, but only in small ways. For a long time, they had a Greenpeace table at every show. When Greenpeace discontinued their touring program, the band replaced them with the Waterwheel Foundation. Every show, they raffle off backstage passes, signed posters, etc., in return for donations. The donations are channeled to local charities -- homeless shelters, safe houses for abused women, and the like. They are, like you said the initial post, safe political bets -- Good Things by anybody's standards. In that sense, Waterwheel isn't too different from the philanthropic arm of any small corporation.

That leads to something else I've been thinking about: we assume that Phish's fans are progressive, but why should they be? That's not what the attraction of the music is. There's a sense of exploration, for sure. But, it's a safe kind of exploration. The Dead lived communally. Phish never did. While it might be said that Phish's fans are of a lifestyle, it's not the same thing. Most of Phish's fans are college-age. The people who go out on tour with Phish, for the most part, aren't (mostly) not doing so at the expense of their broader lives. Like college, Phish tour (and especially Phish festivals) is a liminal space, a sorta morally autonomous zone where
kids can try different things (usually drugs, but also living on less money, etc.). While the act of entering a liminal territory is a sign of some liberalism, it only is to a degree. I think it'd be more fair to say that it's part of growing up. Of course, one can also look at Phish tour as a breeding ground for budding capitalists.

In terms of actual musical qualities, what brings Phish fans together is a sense of musical adventure, but only a certain kind of musical adventure. Medeski Martin and Wood are an interesting example, to this end: after Trey endorsed them in 1995 (they opened some Phish shows, and Trey wrote in the Phish newsletter that they were "music that makes [him] want to drive too fast"), Phish fans began showing up at their shows. Now, MMW are from the NYC scene -- came up playing with Zorn and Ribot and that bunch. As was vogue in the early '90s, they were also into Afro-Cuban rhythms, old funk, etc.. It was music that was danceable. There was a big spike in their popularity. A year or so after that, the band moved into a deeply atonal
period. The Phish fans hated it. While Phish frequently is atonal, it's mostly as a counter-balance to their brighter stuff. There's always brightness at the end. With MMW, they'd stay dark and discordant for entire sets. While they surely gained many new fans anyway, it's clear that the
mass audience wasn't into the weird stuff. (Their last album, FWIW, was a return to the groove-oriented material of yore.)

What brings Phish fans together, then, is an idea of whimsy. This doesn't imply a liberal fanbase at all (nor does it exclude one). You wrote of Phish (and others) distrust of power, which I think is definitely true. You conclude by saying "But people need to be organized, and telling them what to think is different than identifying a bunch of people who think the same way and getting them to all speak together to get something done." I agree, but I'm starting to wonder: do Phish fans really all think in the same way? Would there be some way of finding out? It's possible that their fanbase is more democratic (as opposed to Democratic) than it might first appear. Even so, I'd still wager that - given the average age of Phish fans - that most of 'em would vote Democrat. However, whether they would do so as a result of the same thing which made them like Phish... well, that's another question.